Research Critique: Exploring the uses of mobile phones to support informal learning

Research Critique: Exploring the uses of mobile phones to support informal learning (Santos & Ali, 2011).
by Donggil Song, 2011.

 

In the target study, ‘Exploring the uses of mobile phones to support informal learning’, the authors (Santos & Ali, 2011) investigated how a group of undergraduate students in the United  Arab Emirates (UAE) use mobile phones to perform informal learning related to their courses. The authors adopted an exploratory case study design and used questionnaires, interviews, and diary entries. The results showed that the participants performed informal learning activities without teachers’ guidance. In addition, the participants used only a few applications but these were considered useful to informal learning. Informal learning could not be measured by means of indicators traditionally used in the field of education (Skule, 2004). Thus, it was a progressive approach to measure informal learning activities of learners with mobile devices. Considering the significance and novelty of the research topic, it is suggested that this study could contribute to the mobile learning field. Result interpretations, and logical connections, the trial and the findings are significant to the field of mobile learning and informal learning.

 

111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch1 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch2 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch3 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch4 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch5 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch6 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch7 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch8 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch9 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch10 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch11 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch12 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch13 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch14 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch15 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch16 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch17 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch18 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch19 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch20 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch21 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch22 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch23 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch24 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch25 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch26 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch27 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch28 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch29 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch30 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch31 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch32 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch33 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch34 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch35 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch36 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch37 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch38 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch39 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch40 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch41 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch42 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch43 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch44 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch45 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch46 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch47 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch48 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch49 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch50 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch51 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch52 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch53 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch54 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch55 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch56 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch57 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch58 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch59 111027_DSong_R690_CritiquesOfResearch60

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *